dc.contributor.author | Konieczny, Jerzy | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-30T07:27:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-30T07:27:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.citation | European Polygraph 2009, nr 2, s. 59-67. | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 1898-5238 | pl |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11315/24915 | |
dc.description.abstract | "For some time now, certain practical and theoretical achievements of forensic
sciences have become subject of a very serious criticism. It is difficult to say
what was at the root of this process: whether it was the glaring neglect on
behalf of the experts and others in the trial of the so called “Birmingham
Six” (although this very case is often considered a milestone in expertise
quality), or other, unfortunately numerous examples of drastic expert errors,
which led to penalizing innocent persons, or the increase of methodological
awareness of some academic authors. Undoubtedly, both factors had their role
here – dramatic social response to the judicial mistakes, as well as essential
deepening of the interest in epistemological aspects of forensic sciences. "(...) | pl |
dc.language.iso | en | pl |
dc.publisher | Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM | pl |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | polygraph examination | pl |
dc.subject | forensic identification | pl |
dc.subject.other | Prawo | pl |
dc.subject.other | Psychologia | pl |
dc.title | Polygraph Examination and the Crisis of Traditional Concept of Forencis Identification | pl |
dc.type | Artykuł | |